We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
The benchmarks added in #948 show that Comet's Spark-compatible aggregates are ~50% slower than the DataFusion equivalents:
aggregate/avg_decimal_datafusion time: [653.56 µs 657.57 µs 662.06 µs] aggregate/avg_decimal_comet time: [1.0581 ms 1.0592 ms 1.0604 ms] aggregate/sum_decimal_datafusion time: [695.51 µs 696.48 µs 697.60 µs] aggregate/sum_decimal_comet time: [1.0218 ms 1.0230 ms 1.0242 ms]
No response
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Related upstream changes in arrow-rs: apache/arrow-rs#6419
Sorry, something went wrong.
No branches or pull requests
What is the problem the feature request solves?
The benchmarks added in #948 show that Comet's Spark-compatible aggregates are ~50% slower than the DataFusion equivalents:
Describe the potential solution
No response
Additional context
No response
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: