Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Investigate nano-gemm crate to improve speed of linear algebra #290

Open
cschwan opened this issue May 31, 2024 · 0 comments · May be fixed by #292
Open

Investigate nano-gemm crate to improve speed of linear algebra #290

cschwan opened this issue May 31, 2024 · 0 comments · May be fixed by #292
Assignees
@cschwan

Comments

@cschwan
Copy link
Contributor

cschwan commented May 31, 2024 •
edited
Loading

Some time ago I saw this blog post, https://sarah-ek.veganb.tw/blog/nano-gemm/, which shows a new implementation of matrix multiplication that's quite fast for our use case ('square', size = 50) and in particular faster than ndarray's by maybe 20%. We should investigate how to use the crate and see if that translates into faster evolution methods. The repository of nano-gemm is at https://github.com/sarah-ek/nano-gemm.
@cschwan cschwan self-assigned this May 31, 2024
@cschwan cschwan linked a pull request Jun 6, 2024 that will close this issue
Use nano-gemm instead of matrixmultiply #292
Open
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@cschwan cschwan

Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

Use nano-gemm instead of matrixmultiply NNPDF/pineappl
1 participant
@cschwan