function-name: add private static method regex

[ckhatri]

If you have a private static method, currently I believe the linter reads it as private first and then uses the private regex. But I believe it should still use the static regex, since its a static method and its a great way to show that it is.

so private static methods currently are linted to be: getPotatoes() instead of GET_POTATOES().

Was wondering if y'all agree.

[JoshuaKGoldberg]

Great catch, thanks for posting this! This feels like something that should be configurable. Relevant options:

• Validate private statics as privates
• Validate private statics as statics
• Validate private statics as both both privates and statics

Thoughts?

[ckhatri]

I think we should validate private statics as statics, to keep the ALL_CAPS consistent between all statics, no matter the type of the static. That way you can immediately tell its a static method, regardless of if its private/public/protected.