Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Entry-editor typing lag #4537

Closed
wujastyk opened this issue Dec 14, 2018 · 3 comments
Closed

Entry-editor typing lag #4537

wujastyk opened this issue Dec 14, 2018 · 3 comments

Comments

@wujastyk
Copy link

I am experiencing terribly slow data entry in the entry-editor. I first reported this in #4526, but I'm making a separate report here for clarity's sake. This makes the present JabRef snapshot unusable.

JabRef 5.0-dev--snapshot--2018-12-14--master--49c3ef396
Linux 4.15.0-42-generic amd64
Java 1.8.0_191

Both in the field-tabs, and in the biblatex area, it can take two seconds from keypress to the appearance of a single character on the screen. Needless to say, Jabref 5 is unusable until this is improved.

Autocompletion is off.

Jabref 4.3.1 works fine.

My biblatex database has about 4000 entries (here's a link, if you want to examine it). With a smaller database the typing works much better. Still not quite at system-speed (compared against a terminal window). But definitely in the range of normal data entry.

Detail information:
Opening: /home/dom/Dropbox/localtexmf/bibtex/bib/biblio4-utf8.bib
@wujastyk
Copy link
Author

wujastyk commented Dec 18, 2018

JabRef 5.0-dev--snapshot--2018-12-17--master--2754c2891
Linux 4.15.0-42-generic amd64
Java 1.8.0_191

No improvement with the latest changes, unfortunately.

This screencapture illustrates the lag between typing and the appearance of characters on the screen. I was whacking the keys somewhat to make sure they were audible. :-)
[this video was briefly missing yesterday, Dec 18; it's restored now]

@wujastyk
Copy link
Author

JabRef 5.0-dev--snapshot--2018-12-19--master--949d20496
Linux 4.15.0-43-generic amd64
Java 1.8.0_191

So much improved! Using 5.0 now possible again. Thank you!

@buhtz
Copy link

buhtz commented Jul 30, 2019

#5156

I still have this problem.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants