Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

add improvements for SANDAG cross border model #484

Closed
bstabler opened this issue Sep 17, 2021 · 3 comments
Closed

add improvements for SANDAG cross border model #484

bstabler opened this issue Sep 17, 2021 · 3 comments
Assignees

Comments

@bstabler
Copy link
Contributor

See work being done in PR #481

@wusun2
Copy link

wusun2 commented Sep 21, 2021

SANDAG migrated its Crossborder model from CT-RAMP to ActivitySim recently. The goals are: 1) better software engineering to improve model maintenance and performance 2) test ActivitySim extensibility on a special market model 3) update the model to reflect a recent survey. The first two software engineering goals have been achieved. Not only ActivitySim has been extended to a special market model, but also the ActivitySim-based software is 50-60% faster than the CT-RAMP software. Additionally, the results from ActivitySim-based software have been validated against the results from CT-RAMP.

This PR only includes generic modules that potentially could benefit the core ActivitySim; it has no regional or Crossborder model specific features. Care was taken to ensure all changes submitted are fully backward compatible with existing ActivitySim implementations. Many special market models in the pipeline, such as the visitor model and the air passenger model, likely will not operate on a synthetic population as in the core ActivitySim, rather they are more likely start with enumerating and constructing trips. The crossborder model could provide useful insights for other special market models in the pipeline. SANDAG and RSG ask the consortium and the bench consultants to review this PR.

@bstabler
Copy link
Contributor Author

bstabler commented Oct 7, 2021

We discussed on the 10/7 call that this task will remain open until the PR is accepted

@bstabler
Copy link
Contributor Author

this has been merged so I'm closing the issue

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants