From 0fe5dad33673e5279e2802a50da9f42168f2006f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: larliv <150813596+larliv@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2023 10:26:22 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] Update 2015-07-09-HCC-compression-without-exadata.md

---
 _posts/2015-07-09-HCC-compression-without-exadata.md | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/_posts/2015-07-09-HCC-compression-without-exadata.md b/_posts/2015-07-09-HCC-compression-without-exadata.md
index 974a0e4..b717d30 100755
--- a/_posts/2015-07-09-HCC-compression-without-exadata.md
+++ b/_posts/2015-07-09-HCC-compression-without-exadata.md
@@ -4,6 +4,7 @@ title: HCC compression with DIRECT INSERT and without it
 categories: compression
 tags: [oracle, exadata, hcc, compression]
 author: oleg
+keep: yes
 ---
 
 I was invited to test a compression on ZFS storage when datafiles were placed on dnfs.
@@ -177,4 +178,4 @@ Of course, the level of HCC compression depends on the quantity of repeatable ro
 
 As you can see, I have populated the tables with strings from scott.emp.
 
-On real data you might get less percentage. Not 10 times.
\ No newline at end of file
+On real data you might get less percentage. Not 10 times.