From 0fe5dad33673e5279e2802a50da9f42168f2006f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: larliv <150813596+larliv@users.noreply.github.com> Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2023 10:26:22 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] Update 2015-07-09-HCC-compression-without-exadata.md --- _posts/2015-07-09-HCC-compression-without-exadata.md | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/_posts/2015-07-09-HCC-compression-without-exadata.md b/_posts/2015-07-09-HCC-compression-without-exadata.md index 974a0e4..b717d30 100755 --- a/_posts/2015-07-09-HCC-compression-without-exadata.md +++ b/_posts/2015-07-09-HCC-compression-without-exadata.md @@ -4,6 +4,7 @@ title: HCC compression with DIRECT INSERT and without it categories: compression tags: [oracle, exadata, hcc, compression] author: oleg +keep: yes --- I was invited to test a compression on ZFS storage when datafiles were placed on dnfs. @@ -177,4 +178,4 @@ Of course, the level of HCC compression depends on the quantity of repeatable ro As you can see, I have populated the tables with strings from scott.emp. -On real data you might get less percentage. Not 10 times. \ No newline at end of file +On real data you might get less percentage. Not 10 times.