Discussion re version 3.3 (and v 3.2) #3
eeholmes
started this conversation in
Team Posts
Replies: 2 comments
-
Thanks, Eli! By Github-SOP, we are talking about the nmfs-opensci SOP, correct? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
Yes. This discussion thread is just specific to the nmfs-opensci SOP not the bigger vision discussion or any other SOPs. Over the weekend, I did another update to the nmfs-opensci SOP to make it clearer that this isn't a new SOP. This is trying to give pragmatic guidance and makes clear that local centers/offices might have their own SOPs. I added more links to the existing guidance too. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
I edited the intro of the SOP because after getting Rick's feedback and Josh and my discussions last week, I realized that it sounded confrontational. The goal is to help staff understand and follow guidelines, but there are also lot of interpretation problems with the guidelines. Here is a presentation from PMEL. Not sure sure when I am guessing around 2018 or so. https://drive.google.com/file/d/1zdSesY5QrkXHD2RVW_e8Wewed1gQf-Ki/view
I started this thread to try out using GitHub discussions instead of email. This is just for the GitHub-SOP doc and mainly for those working on it. The Visioning thread is on email.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions