Skip to content

wip: add createWithResult method and AppActionCallStructuredResult type [EXT-6156] #2681

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Draft
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

jjolton-contentful
Copy link
Contributor

  • Introduced method in the AppActionCall API to return structured results.
  • Added type for better response handling.
  • Updated relevant interfaces and types across multiple files to support the new functionality.
  • Enhanced existing methods to include headers for improved request handling.

Summary

Description

Motivation and Context

Checklist (check all before merging)

  • Both unit and integration tests are passing
  • There are no breaking changes
  • Changes are reflected in the documentation

When adding a new method:

  • The new method is exported through the default and plain CMA client
  • All new public types are exported from ./lib/export-types.ts
  • Added a unit test for the new method
  • Added an integration test for the new method
  • The new method is added to the documentation

@jjolton-contentful jjolton-contentful changed the title feat: add createWithResult method and AppActionCallStructuredResult type [EXT-6156] wip: add createWithResult method and AppActionCallStructuredResult type [EXT-6156] Jul 3, 2025
- Introduced  method in the AppActionCall API to return structured results.
- Added  type for better response handling.
- Updated relevant interfaces and types across multiple files to support the new functionality.
- Enhanced existing methods to include headers for improved request handling.
@jjolton-contentful jjolton-contentful force-pushed the feat/app-action-create-with-result branch from 29407b5 to d9f36a8 Compare July 3, 2025 22:18
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant