Skip to content

FMWK-788 Improved bandwidth limiter #315

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 11 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Conversation

filkeith
Copy link
Contributor

@filkeith filkeith commented Jul 9, 2025

New limiter implementation

@filkeith filkeith marked this pull request as ready for review July 9, 2025 11:13
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Jul 9, 2025

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 70.78652% with 26 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 79.92%. Comparing base (6303221) to head (3f09e64).

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
internal/bandwidth/limiter.go 20.00% 8 Missing ⚠️
client.go 25.00% 4 Missing and 2 partials ⚠️
handler_backup.go 33.33% 3 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
handler_restore.go 60.00% 3 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
internal/bandwidth/bucket.go 94.44% 2 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
pipe/chains.go 0.00% 1 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #315      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   79.89%   79.92%   +0.02%     
==========================================
  Files          95       96       +1     
  Lines        9562     9619      +57     
==========================================
+ Hits         7640     7688      +48     
- Misses       1478     1489      +11     
+ Partials      444      442       -2     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

- review fixes
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants